AI writes the proof.
The compiler keeps it honest.
A compiler tower that takes proposed annotations from any LLM and only accepts what's verifiable. Composition narrows the lattice; customer rules turn into proofs; the asset compounds.
The substrate, in five steps
One compiler tower. Three tiers. Every annotation accepted only when mechanically true.
- 01
AI proposes annotations
Any LLM (GPT, Claude, Gemini, a swarm of all three) proposes types, invariants, and lemmas across the codebase. Cheap, parallel, often wrong.
See the paradigm → - 02
Verifier accepts only what's true
The compiler checks every annotation. Hallucinations die at the gate; what survives is mechanically true. No human in the loop.
Watch the ticker → - 03
Composition narrows the lattice
Each accepted annotation tightens the abstract value lattice. Imprecision shrinks; later proofs become reachable that weren't before.
See the morph → - 04
Customer rules turn into proofs
You write a rule ("PII never reaches a marketing sink"). The compiler turns it into a proof obligation; the substrate either proves it, suspends it, or hands you a counterexample trace.
Open the studio → - 05
The asset compounds
Every verified property is a permanent asset. Replay any incident against the substrate; verified contracts compose across releases. The library grows with every commit.
Replay an incident →
Three tiers